Skip to content

Blog

Engineering notes and agentic MEP

Practical articles on agentic MEP, engineering workflows and the wider WYRM platform.

MEP

Is it GDPR-compliant to use AI for MEP design?

Bring data protection into the engineering workflow. Start with the project information, the people who need access and the requirements that apply to its use.

Jun 25, 2026|2 min read
Read
MEP

Why we built WYRM MEP

WYRM connects building services calculations, thermal modelling, coordinated drawings and documents in one workspace. A custom AI model directs the work, deterministic engines calculate the design, and engineers review the result.

Jun 9, 2026|8 min read
Read
MEP

Why WYRM MEP never lets a language model size a cable

A general-purpose model that is usually right becomes a liability the moment 'usually' turns into a mis-sized cable. WYRM splits the work: agents read, plan and draft; algorithmic engines do the maths; two QA gates check the join. Bounded, visible failure instead of unbounded, silent error.

Jun 10, 2026|9 min read
Read
MEP

The change cascade: MEP coordination is a graph problem

The expensive failure in MEP is rarely the first design — it's the change that ripples through six documents and gets missed in one. WYRM MEP keeps the whole job connected so a single change cascades correctly across every discipline, batched into a digest, never a stream of pings.

Jun 11, 2026|8 min read
Read
MEP

From brief to deliverables: the WYRM MEP workspace

Drop the ERs on the Project tab and WYRM extracts the design constraints, locks them against their source paragraphs, and runs every downstream tab — sizing, EPC, deliverables — from that single spec. Spec, schedule and drawing stay reconciled by construction, not by hand.

Jun 12, 2026|8 min read
Read
MEP

"Can I swap this for that?" — the MEP QA Advisor

Most MEP coordination errors start with an innocent substitution made under time pressure. The £20 MEP Advisor tier is built around that single question — swap this fan coil for that 21 kW unit — and answers it against the standards, with the downstream knock-ons surfaced before you commit.

Jun 13, 2026|6 min read
Read
Company

Why We Built WYRM Procure

Procurement teams lose hours every week to tab-switching between sanctions portals, commodity feeds, FX rates, and supplier directories. We built WYRM Procure — an agentic AI platform — because we believe the answer should come to the buyer, not the other way around.

Mar 18, 2026|6 min read
Read
Technology

Agentic AI for Procurement, Explained

Agentic AI procurement is not a dashboard. It is a set of specialist agents operating in parallel across sanctions, FX, commodities, shipping, carbon, and supplier data, returning one ranked procurement answer with full evidence trail.

Mar 20, 2026|8 min read
Read
Engineering

Building the Agentic Procurement Pipeline

Seven specialised agentic workers run simultaneously every time a buyer searches a product. We fuse their outputs — sanctions risk, CO₂ liability, FX exposure, commodity forecast, shipping cost, supplier capacity — through a predictive scoring model and return the ranked answer. Here's the architecture.

Mar 25, 2026|12 min read
Read
Technology

Agentic AI vs RAG vs Copilots: What Procurement Actually Needs

RAG answers questions. Copilots summarise screens. Procurement needs something that reasons across live markets, sanctions, and freight — then shows its working.

Apr 22, 2026|10 min read
Read
Compliance

Agentic AI for CBAM Category Managers: A Field Guide

CBAM liability calculated in spreadsheets after the PO is signed is a compliance risk. Agentic AI moves the calculation to the moment of decision.

Apr 24, 2026|12 min read
Read
Public Sector

Agentic AI for UK Government Procurement: Act 2023 Alignment

The Procurement Act 2023 asks buyers to justify supplier decisions on record. Agentic AI makes the justification a by-product of the decision itself.

Apr 26, 2026|10 min read
Read
Ledger

Agentic AI for bid + tender intelligence

Tender platforms aggregate notices. They do not tell you which to bid on, and they certainly do not draft the response. WYRM Ledger does both — capability-match against win history, then a structured draft aligned with the awarding authority's evaluation criteria.

May 8, 2026|8 min read
Read
Cyber

CVE triage at scale — why EPSS + KEV beat CVSS alone

CVSS is theoretical severity. EPSS is real-world exploit probability. KEV is observed exploitation. Use all three — weighted correctly against the operator's footprint — and the weekly action list drops from hundreds to single digits.

May 9, 2026|9 min read
Read
Legal

Why clause playbooks beat one-off contract review

Contract review without a documented playbook is opinion. With one, it is policy enforcement. WYRM Legal turns your negotiated baselines into a comparison engine — every incoming contract gets the same treatment, every time.

May 10, 2026|8 min read
Read
Data

Entity resolution is the cross-module substrate

A sanctioned supplier, a CVE-exposed processor, and a counterparty in a DPA are often the same legal entity wearing three names. Entity resolution is what lets a finding in one WYRM module trigger the right action in the others.

May 11, 2026|9 min read
Read